Two contrasting usages of my photos found on the Internet in the last couple of days: firstly, the nice people at Schmap sent me this email:
Hi Mike,
I am delighted to let you know that your three submitted
photos have been selected for inclusion in the newly
released third edition of our Schmap London Guide:Hackney City Farm
http://www.schmap.com/london/sights_zoos/p=1127/i=1127_3.jpgRHS Flower Show
http://www.schmap.com/london/events_victoriaandpimlico/p=317037/i=317037.jpgRHS Flower Show
http://www.schmap.com/london/events_victoriaandpimlico/p=317037/i=317037_5.jpgIf you like the guide and have a website, blog or personal
page, then please also check out our schmapplets -
customizable widgetized versions of our Schmap London
Guide, complete with your published photos:http://www.schmap.com/schmapplets/p=55236434N00/c=SE10011021
Please enjoy the guide!
Best regards,
Luke Ritchie,
Managing Editor, Schmap Guides
In sharp contrast to this welcome, authorised use of my pics and polite communication, I discovered a number of my Burlesque shots being used here. While I’m quite happy for the Burlesque group to use my pics to promote their night (I did, after all, take the shots at one of their club nights), I was a little narked that they did it a) without crediting me for the photos or linking to the originals on flickr, and b) without letting me know they were using them…















